alchu
Have a nice day, eh?


Tuesday, January 23, 2007  

Brooklyn Museum

Bett and I went to the Brooklyn Museum this past Saturday to check out the Annie Leibovitz exhibit. Since this weekend was the last weekend for the exhibit, the lines were INSANE. We parked in the lot, walked through the back and BAM - HUGE line to pay for tickets. We're talking... a 45 minute wait. After buying tickets, yet another line was waiting for us at the elevators. Another 45 minute wait. After getting to the 5th floor? Yep, another line. This last line was more interesting as there was some American art to look at. We saw some O'Keeffe paintings and this one painting that was inspired by Olympia, a Manet that we saw at the Musee D'Orsay in Paris.

While in line, we had to walk through this larger exhibition - works from sculptor Ron Mueck.

Wow. We stayed behind the roped line (obviously, since we had waited about 2 hrs by this point and there were only about 2 more minutes left) for the Leibovitz exhibit, but really after walking through that room, I couldn't wait to check out these sculptures. It's interesting, as we were walking through the main entrance, they had 4 Rodin sculptures for us to examine. Betty and I didn't really look at them too closely (who expects quality pieces like that in the foyer??) but we did remember what we saw at the Rodin museum in Paris. Some amazing work by an artist with a phenomenal sense of the human body. Mueck's work is much, much different, but you definitely get that sense as well. Betty and I agreed that while the Leibovitz exhibit was interesting, the Mueck exhibit really captured our attention

Anyway, the exhibit is here till Feb 4th. Highly recommended if you are curious. Check it out!

posted by Allan | 1/23/2007 10:37:00 AM | 1 comment


Friday, January 19, 2007  

Interesting. A friend of Betty's forwarded her this from the pastor of Joy Christian Fellowship in NJ.

God and Gambling

It's an interesting argument that the Pastor is making. Thoughts anyone?

My main argument against the way in which this article was written is as follows:

"The issue I have with this article is how matter of fact he is being in terms of what is okay and what is not okay. People don't need a new law or "updated bible for the times" for real heart change, they need Christ himself. This pastor doesn't seem to be concerned with the saving work of Christ but rather how to instill new guidelines for his congregation to follow. That's the stance of legalism... and we know that legalism doesn't save. "

But Wai points out that this guy is a pastor and his job is to guide his flock in their best interest.

Which is a great point.

so... thoughts?

Oh, incidentally here's Ch 20 of the Westminster Confession of Faith... I'm not using it as arguments for or against what is being said in the article. Just as reference!

Of Christian Liberty, and Liberty of Conscience.

I. The liberty which Christ hath purchased for believers under the gospel consists in their freedom from the guilt of sin, the condemning wrath of God, the curse of the moral law; and in their being delivered from thos present evil world, bondage to Satan, and dominion of sin, from the evil of afflictions, the sting of death, the victory of the grave, and everlasting damnation; as also in their free access to God, and their yielding obedience unto him, not out of slavish fear, but a childlike love, and a willing mind. All which were common also to believers under the law; but under the New Testament the liberty of Christians is further enlarged in their freedom from the yoke of the ceremonial law, to which the Jewish Church was subjected; and in greater boldness of access to the throne of grace, and in fuller communications of the free Spirit of God, than believers under the law did ordinarily partake of.

II. God alone is Lord of the conscience, and hath left it free from the doctrines and commandments of men which are in any thing contrary to his Word, or beside it in matters of faith on worship. So that to believe such doctrines, or to obey such commandments out of conscience, is ts betray true liberty of conscience; and the requiring an implicit faith, and an absolute and blind obedience, is to destroy liberty of conscience, and reason also.

III. They who, upon pretense of Christian liberty, do practice any sin, or cherish any lust, do thereby destroy the end of Christian liberty; which is, that, being delivered out of the hands of our enemies, we might serve the Lord without fear, in holiness and righteousness before him, all the days of our life.

IV. And because the powers which God hath ordained, and the liberty which Christ hath purchased, are not intended by God to destroy, but mutually to uphold and preserve one another; they who, upon pretense of Christian liberty, shall oppose any lawful power, or the lawful exercise of it, whether it be civil or ecclesiastical, resist the ordinance of God. And for their publishing of such opinions, or maintaining of such practices, as are contrary to the light of nature, or to the known principles of Christianity, whether concerning faith, worship, or conversation; or to the power of godliness; or such erroneous opinions or practices as, either in their own nature, or in the manner of publishing or maintaining them, are destructive to the external peace and order which Christ hath established in the Church: they may be lawfully called to account, and proceeded against by the censures of the Church, and by the power of the Civil Magistrate.

posted by Allan | 1/19/2007 04:19:00 PM | 0 comments


Wednesday, January 17, 2007  

Bad Coaching

the pats/chargers game... all boiled down to one offensive set

score 21-21
4 mins left, charger ball at their own 29

I'm like. Oh, I saw this last week. eagles-giants. Chargers won this one, good try, Pats!

All they need to do feed the ball to LT... he marches up the field and they kick in a field goal, leaving 0 time for the pats right?

He's the MVP of the whole league. Teams have stacked 8 in the box against him and haven't stopped him. To that point in the game he's run 22 times for 118 yards, 1 touchdown. averaging like 5.3 yards a carry. THEY CANT STOP HIM, right??

first play, LT to the right. 5 yards (of course, that's his stinking average)
2nd and 5... incomplete pass.
TIME OUT
3rd and 5... incomplete pass.
punt

Absolutely retarded.


AND WHAT WAS UP WITH RIED NOT GOING FOR IT ON 4th and 15????

posted by Allan | 1/17/2007 01:54:00 PM | 0 comments
.:links:.
.:blogs:.
.:photos:.
.:videos:.
.:archives:.